<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Windsurf on Bruce on AI Engineering</title><link>http://www.heyuan110.com/tags/windsurf/</link><description>Recent content in Windsurf on Bruce on AI Engineering</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2026 22:16:52 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://www.heyuan110.com/tags/windsurf/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Claude Code vs Cursor vs Windsurf 2026: Speed, Cost &amp; Control</title><link>http://www.heyuan110.com/posts/ai/2026-02-18-claude-code-vs-cursor-vs-windsurf-2026/</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2026 22:16:52 +0800</pubDate><guid>http://www.heyuan110.com/posts/ai/2026-02-18-claude-code-vs-cursor-vs-windsurf-2026/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.heyuan110.com/posts/ai/2026-02-18-claude-code-vs-cursor-vs-windsurf-2026/cover.webp"
 alt="Cover image comparing Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf across speed, cost, and controllability"
 
 loading="lazy"
 decoding="async"
 fetchpriority="low"
 width="1200"
 height="630"
/&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you just want the bottom line: &lt;strong&gt;pick Cursor for team collaboration and stable delivery, Claude Code for terminal-heavy development and automation, and Windsurf for rapid frontend/full-stack prototyping&lt;/strong&gt;. This article tackles a real problem — there are too many AI coding tools in 2026, and you need a practical framework to choose by speed, cost, and controllability rather than following hype.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>