<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Requirements Analysis on Bruce on AI Engineering</title><link>http://www.heyuan110.com/tags/requirements-analysis/</link><description>Recent content in Requirements Analysis on Bruce on AI Engineering</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2026 22:00:00 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://www.heyuan110.com/tags/requirements-analysis/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>22 Thinking Frameworks That Turn Vague Ideas Into Clear Requirements</title><link>http://www.heyuan110.com/posts/ai/2026-01-31-thinking-methodologies-guide/</link><pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2026 22:00:00 +0800</pubDate><guid>http://www.heyuan110.com/posts/ai/2026-01-31-thinking-methodologies-guide/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;ldquo;Build me a user management system.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You hand that sentence to an AI, and it spits out a pile of code. You open it up and it is nothing like what you had in mind. Or you spend thirty minutes explaining requirements to a colleague, only to discover you were talking about completely different things.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The problem is not that the AI is not smart enough, or that your colleague is not cooperating. The problem is that the requirement was too vague.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>