<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Kimi K2.5 on Bruce on AI Engineering</title><link>http://www.heyuan110.com/tags/kimi-k2.5/</link><description>Recent content in Kimi K2.5 on Bruce on AI Engineering</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 10:00:00 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://www.heyuan110.com/tags/kimi-k2.5/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Cursor Composer 2 Review: The Kimi K2.5 Controversy and What It Means for AI Coding</title><link>http://www.heyuan110.com/posts/ai/2026-04-04-cursor-composer-2-review/</link><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 10:00:00 +0800</pubDate><guid>http://www.heyuan110.com/posts/ai/2026-04-04-cursor-composer-2-review/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.heyuan110.com/posts/ai/2026-04-04-cursor-composer-2-review/cover.webp"
 alt="Cursor Composer 2 — where Western product meets Eastern foundation model"
 
 loading="lazy"
 decoding="async"
 fetchpriority="low"
 width="1200"
 height="630"
/&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On March 19, 2026, Cursor shipped Composer 2 with a triumphant blog post. Faster, smarter, cheaper — the usual superlatives. Three days later, a developer on X noticed something peculiar in Cursor&amp;rsquo;s API configuration: a model identifier reading &lt;code&gt;kimi-k2p5-rl-0317-s515-fast&lt;/code&gt;. That single string unraveled a story about transparency, open-source ethics, and the increasingly global nature of AI infrastructure.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is not just a product review. It is an examination of what happens when a $50 billion startup forgets — or chooses not — to credit the open-source model powering its flagship feature.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>