<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Fish Shell on Bruce on AI Engineering</title><link>http://www.heyuan110.com/tags/fish-shell/</link><description>Recent content in Fish Shell on Bruce on AI Engineering</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 10:00:00 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://www.heyuan110.com/tags/fish-shell/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Fish Shell 4.6 Review: Best Interactive Shell, Wrong Default</title><link>http://www.heyuan110.com/posts/linux/2026-04-18-fish-shell-rust-2026/</link><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 10:00:00 +0800</pubDate><guid>http://www.heyuan110.com/posts/linux/2026-04-18-fish-shell-rust-2026/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.heyuan110.com/posts/linux/2026-04-18-fish-shell-rust-2026/cover.webp"
 alt="Fish shell 4.6 Rust rewrite review 2026"
 
 loading="lazy"
 decoding="async"
 fetchpriority="low"
 width="1200"
 height="630"
/&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Let me open with the contrarian line. &lt;strong&gt;Fish shell 4.6, released March 28, 2026, is the most polished interactive shell I have ever used. It is also the wrong choice for your default shell in the AI agent era.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Those two claims are not in conflict. They are the whole point of this review.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have been running fish as a front-end for the last nine months, since the 4.0 Rust rewrite landed in February 2025. I read the release notes for every point release, I moved my zsh configuration over, I watched the Claude Code bug tracker fill up with &lt;code&gt;fish&lt;/code&gt; in the title, and I eventually settled into a dual-shell setup that I think most AI-heavy developers should copy. This article is that conclusion, backed by numbers.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>