<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Aider on Bruce on AI Engineering</title><link>http://www.heyuan110.com/tags/aider/</link><description>Recent content in Aider on Bruce on AI Engineering</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 10:00:00 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://www.heyuan110.com/tags/aider/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Terminal AI Coding Tools 2026: Three Lanes, Not One Race</title><link>http://www.heyuan110.com/posts/ai/2026-04-14-terminal-ai-coding-tools-2026-comparison/</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 10:00:00 +0800</pubDate><guid>http://www.heyuan110.com/posts/ai/2026-04-14-terminal-ai-coding-tools-2026-comparison/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.heyuan110.com/posts/ai/2026-04-14-terminal-ai-coding-tools-2026-comparison/cover.webp"
 alt="Terminal AI coding tools 2026 comparison — Claude Code, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI, Aider"
 
 loading="lazy"
 decoding="async"
 fetchpriority="low"
 width="1200"
 height="630"
/&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Almost every &amp;ldquo;terminal AI coding tools comparison&amp;rdquo; makes the same structural error: put four tools in a flat table, compare features row by row, conclude &amp;ldquo;it depends on your needs.&amp;rdquo; This framing is misleading.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The 2026 terminal AI coding landscape has &lt;strong&gt;diverged into distinct species&lt;/strong&gt;. These tools differ in architecture philosophy, pricing model, and target user. Comparing Claude Code (a $200/month autonomous agent) against Gemini CLI (free, 1,000 requests per day) on &amp;ldquo;feature count&amp;rdquo; is like comparing a Tesla Model 3 to a city bus by &amp;ldquo;number of seats.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>